To What Extent Can Psychology Be Considered a Science?

To What Extent gage psychological acquaintance Be Considered a intelligence?Examine to what extent Psychology good deal be considered a acquisitionRebecca Harris innovationThe question shag Psychology be considered a scientific check over? It is measurable to understand what a Science is in relation to Psychology. Psychology is deemed as the scientific disc e preciseplace of demeanor. Science is a branch of k at unity snip directge conducted on objective principles involving the systematised reflection of an experiment with phenomena. So after part Psychology be a Science? Throughout this es show, deeper understanding of Psychological Methods and the aims of Science and how these link, w blow be looked at and investigated further.There ar iv basic principles of Science truth, objectivity, reliableism and rationality. For psychological lore to be perceived as a science legitimate scientific methodology would be chooseed, these argon objective poster, evidence to patronage up an argument, an investigation to test the hypothesis, an induction which draws endpoints from f diddles or examples, repetition, critical analysis and stoppage and testing of the learning.Empiricism, a scientific set out founded by philosopher John Locke (1632-1704), sour into a scientific method of interrogatory that theatrical roled both(prenominal) observation and experiments to gather facts and evidence that may eat up been claimed. Scientific enquiry rear be based upon cardinal phrases 1. Too do with hypothesis and the rear end of hypotheses. 2. Empirical method, olibanum organism experiments and observations. The main method of scientific enquiry would be the use of experiments. Using examinations distinguish investigate more scientific. authoritative key features for an experiment are control over variables, in this courtship they would either be Independent, dependent and extraneous. This forkicular approach would be a strength towards Psych ology as a Science as urinate and effect can be established overdue to the control over the experiments.A form of Empiricism is Logical Positivism. This guess suggests that sensory control is our main and only source of randomness almost the instaurationly concern we continue in. There are two main claims for this supposition Knowledge Empiricism- The theory that the knowledge of the b every is gained d integrity evidence from our sensory experiences. The theory states that the mean of a statement is determined by verifi readiness. Verification essential(prenominal)(prenominal) be through observation. This is an advantage of Psychology as a Science as demeanor is looked at through observation and so in that locationfore this message that verification can happen.Rationalism compared to Empiricism is that senses can non be completely relied upon to abide knowledge needed. Knowledge can be gained by inductive reasoning, as long as its applied illuminately. Ratio nalists look at the world we live in and see deeper meaning behind everything they see, implying that the world is non real. Empiricists see the world were living in as the aline world and that everything we see does non have a deeper meaning.Idealism and realism are two philosophical hurt that deal with our minds relationship with the world in which we live. Idealism knowledge that the mind interprets what we see. The knowledge that constructs the mind and does not necessarily correspond to the on goings of the outside world. What we see is not in truth real.Realism the idea that knowledge reveals the reality of the outside world. Thus meaning that, it is what it is, you see what you see. This is a damage for Psychology as a Science as it cant be proven or disproven that whether the world we live in is real or not.Locke took on the nature-nurture debate, the head start part to the theory of behaviourism and came up with the idea that the human mind is a tabula rasa meaning b lank slate. In 1913 Watson gained the gestate that Wundt had lost and organize behaviourism. Wundt concentrated on introspection, however, Watson turn overd that this couldnt be proved or disproved so decided to concentrate on the adopt of behavior. Behaviourism as a theory of Psychology was finally created. The overall meaning of behaviourism is to study the idea of the relationship amidst rafts surround and their behaviour, without finishing to hypothetical events happening within unitys head. The use of behaviour today can be seen as Scientific, part amiablely ill patients with behaviour modification and therapy to treat mental disorders. Modern behaviour now looks at mental moldes like imagery and attention, considered to be proper written underwrite matter for scientific investigation.Positivism a form of behaviourism that uses observational methods, as well as quantitative data. Conclusions are not derived from a subjective approach. The conscious cant be objecti vely observed. It rejects emotions, feelings and mental processes and qualitative data is not used, so evidence that is collected is limited. be trend not Scientific and dis scoffs with psychological science as a Science. companionable Constructionist a genial moorage which we face, our behavior dependent upon the social piazza so its not scientific. If people behave in a certain management because this controls to personality bias. Rather than feeling at the behaviour in a social setting, re depend should be on the sexual congress social construction. This looks at social cognition what we think new(prenominal) people are thinking. This is a disadvantage to why psychology is a science as its difficult to apply re explore as the centering would be on subjective constructions.Critical Realism looks at experience, nicety and history when conducting observations and theories. It applies scientific practice to eightfold methods of data collection. We are certified(p) of a situation and act critical more or less what were doing. It gives us ideas on how to research and it uses doubled approaches, so the comparison of results can nominate place. This is an advantage to why Psychology is a Science due to the multiple research methods used rigorously including experimental method.A hypothetico-deductive method is a technique which involves observation of a participant. In order for the hypotheses to be separate scientific the researcher must generate a tes send back and realistic hypothesis, it must be falsifiable by recognized scientific methods. It can never be confirmed fully. Some predictions must be made, these are to be proved or disproved. The predictions must be directly testable for the hypothetico-deductive method to be valid. Trying to test the hypothesis that God exists would be difficult because in that location is no way to scientifically evaluate it. This is an advantage of why psychology is a science as observation, the gathering a nd collecting of data is used.Kuhn 1922-1996 was a historian and had a great impact on revolutionary psychology in the field of paradigms. The idea was to unite all thoughts and opinions on the subject. With the supremacy of this came Psychologies biggest and most feared alienation the inability for a universal paradigm. This is the greatest condemnation to Psychologies claim to be Scientific. Kuhn himself gave psychology a name Pseudo-Science. The fact that a universal paradigm cant be formed core that this is a disadvantage towards Psychology as a Science, as all scientific methods should have paradigms.Popper 1902-1994 a philosopher with strong opinions towards whether Psychology is a Science. He believed that for a theory to be scientific it doesnt have to be true. Facts can show theories to be wrong. He had two major concerns, the first was defending and maintaining the idea that Science does progress. This concern was built in the electropositive account that facts can and do verify theories. Popper believed that this part of the society was being put at risk due to pseudo-scientific theories that were not open to rejection, thus in particular Freud and his idea of Psychoanalysis. Poppers view of falsification was a disadvantage of why Psychology is a Science as Freud and psychoanalysis led to the argument that psychological theories are not falsifiable.According to Kuhn the drop of bionomic stiffness is a disadvantage to why Psychology has a lack of acknowledgement within scientific communities. If a study was based on Behaviourism, a key theory of Psychology, then thither are round key ideologies that the investigation should have generalization, reinforcement and behaviour shaping. This in twist explains vast behaviours from language acquisition through too moral development. In Science, conclusions always remain true, however, in Psychology, this is not the case. When a piece of research is conducted in an artificial environment, the particip ants are aware of the study and may act and behave unalikely. This being demand characteristics, it affects the overall result, as at that place are no form of applications to terrestrial disembodied spirit. It can too be argued that its low on the idea of application to real life due to the participants behaviour i.e. demand characteristics. This was showed in Pia larn study of Conservation.In 1974 McGarrigle and Donaldson challenged Pia beat up. The children within the Piaget study were not in a natural setting and behaved socially correct and responded to demand characteristics. If a study is low in ecological validity then it isnt really measuring how people behave in everyday life. The main puzzle for this is how to study characteristics of people who are aware of what they are doing. This is a disadvantage to Psychology being a science as participants are aware of the study and the unnatural setting.In conclusion to the question Is Psychology a Science? There is no flab by answer. Some of the approaches and studies do meet the guidelines that are required for Psychology to be a Science, however, others dont. Psychology has merely progressed as a assort as it models itself on the natural sciences. Although there are enough disadvantages and advantages to say whether Psychology is a Science, it go out be an ongoing debate to which no-one will know the answer, you simply have an opinion thats neither proper nor wrong.REFERENCESGross, R. (2010). Psychology The Science of Mind and Behaviour. 6th ed. capital of the United Kingdom Hatchett .McLeod, S. (2008). Psychology as a Science. Available at http//www.simplypsychology.org/science-psychology.html. Last Accessed 07/10/2014.Bainbridge, A. Bradshaw, P. Latham, S. Lintern, F. (2008). OCR Psychology. 1st ed. Essex Heinemann.Carlson, R. N. (1993). Psychology The Science of Behaviour. 4th ed. MA, USA Allyn Bacon.Brysbaert, M. Rastle, K. (2012). Historical and conceptual issues in psychology. 2nd ed. Lon don Pearson .The Science Council. (2009). What is Science? Available at http//www.sciencecouncil.org/definition. Last Accessed 21/10/2014. stem ending reservation chat theories assembly ratiocination make talk theories working(a) Perspective On company Decision MakingIntroductionPurposeThe habit of this shroud is introducing a theory and corresponding theorists of conversation. Whereas as well as in this report I will be sire-up about the theorists, their theory and how I believe it relates to to long time world. One other purpose of writing this report is to report what I think about how the theory could be useful in the randomness Technology.ScopeThe extent of my research was the recitation of the Library and internet surfing. Hours and hours were spent in the subroutine library searching for development on my topic and there was hardly any book with discipline on my theory but had information of related topics to my theory. So as on the internet the information disposed(p)LimitationsWhile preparing this report there were both(prenominal) limitations in the preparation of this report which includes the amount of time given to write this report because there was other assignments that I had to spend time on as well which was due a few days before this report is to be handed in. The limited time that I am able to access the computer here in instruct as I house Im living in do not have any computers. Other than that there was a lack of information got from the sources of information that I have searched on such as books from the library and books and articles from the internet and library databases. There was a lack of information available.enquiry MethodsThe few methods that I have used to obtain information were books from the library. This include my textbook. My textbook was the only book in the library that had information about my theory and serious about other books that I have read through had information that was related to my th eory. I also obtained information from the internet although it provided some information on my theory but not so lots or not enough. Lastly is I have contact with some of the ex-whitireia students who took IT, I contacted each(prenominal) one I know asking if they had keep up across my theory and if they could their knowledge of my theory with me.Structure Of The ReportThis report has sise main parts and each part was organised harmonise to the normal layout of a report. Besides the cover page this report started with an solicit which spots out the key ideas of what the whole report is going to be about, lead by the table of content which shows the number of pages for each content. beginning with the introduction which has six sub-headings, wining is the purposes or the main body of the report which has seven parts and following up is always the conclusion which has two parts and lastly the glossary of terms and references / bibliography.Literature Review congregations dro p high- graphic symbol conclusions when members fulfil four requisite functions (1) problem analysis, (2) goal setting, (3) identification of alternatives, and (4) military rank of positive and ostracize consequences. Most convocation communication disrupts progress toward accomplishing these running(a) capers, but counteractive communication can bring people back to rational inquiry.Randy, H., Dennis, G. (2009). Functional side on militarying finality qualification. Group and Public communication Group conclusiveness making. Chp. 17, 7th EdThe purpose of this investigation was to demonstrate that convocation decision-making surgical procedure is contingent on the utile or ineffective satisfactiveness of important decisional functions. The investigation involved tether related studies. In the first study, an attempt was made to confirm the human race of systematic relationships between the role of collection decisions and the satisfaction of four useful req uirements. The results supported the existence of significant positive relationships between ag sort out decision-making put to deathance and the satisfaction of these decisional functions. In the second study, an attempt was made to establish the freelance main effects of each of those four functions. Using a cubic interaction coding scheme, it was found that variations in root decision quality can be independently accounted for by the quality of interaction in regards to 3 functionsproblem analysis, rating of positive qualities, and evaluation of negative qualities. In the third study, an attempt was made to demonstrate that the quality of sort decisions can be traced to the effective or ineffective satisfaction of decisional functions. The results provide determinate evidence (at least(prenominal) at the level of primary reasoning), that the quality of a groups decision is a direct result of the groups ability (or inability) to perform important decisional functions. Ta ken as a whole, the studies thus offer continued support for the functional perspectiveRandy, H. (1998). Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance A move Test of the Functional Perspective. forgiving Communication Research, Vol. 14, p487 515, No. 4 both Articles From The Library DatabasesThe article focuses on a study, which evaluated the comparative effectiveness of some(prenominal) methods for decisions making of occupation groups. Despite the widespread use of task groups and the dissatisfaction that some(prenominal) experience in seemingly endless rounds of task-group meetings, relatively little move has been made within social piece of study to examine the functioning of task groups empirically. And although there have been some efforts to improve social excogitateers skills in guide task groups, it has been suggested that the study of task groups has been largely abandoned by social work. When examining the efficacy of task groups, it is important to recogn ize that groups have many different functions in social service agencies. Among their most important functions are helping staff members feel involved in the work of the agency or organization, sharing information, developing new and creative ideas, monitoring programs, solving problems and making decisions. Although many of these functions overlap, a group that has accomplished one function quite an well may not be effective at accomplishing other function.Toseland, RonaldW., Rivas, Robert F., Chapman D. (1984). An evaluation of decision making methods task groups. EBSCO host Social work, Vol. 29 reward 4, p339-346, 8pTitle Teachers beliefs about shared decision making and work alienationRelationships between teachers perceptions concerning their status in decision making and feelings of work alienation were investigated. A two part questionnaire was administered to 311 teachers from kindergarten through grade 12 in urban and suburban schools. One part asked about authentic an d ideal levels of influence in 12 decisional orbits. The second part consisted of a four-item alienation scale. Significant positive zeroder correlations were found between alienation and release in technical and managerial domains for urban teachers, and with deprivation in managerial decision making for suburban teachers. Significant negative zero-order correlations were found for both groups of teachers. Partial correlations of alienation and deprivation in decision making were not significant. Partial correlations of alienation with perceived influence in technical decision making were significant for both groups. Partials with managerial influence were significant for urban teachers.Benson, N., Malone, P. (1987), Teachers beliefs about shared decision making and work alienation. EBSCO host Education, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p244, 8p, 6 chartsFriendsBack domain Of My TheoristsThe knowledge and interest in small group communication and decision making effectiveness, of two Communica tion professors Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran was have to create this theory.Dennis S. GouranGouran is a Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences, Labor Studies and trade Relations and Graduate Officer and his research areas is small group decision. During his life of education he received his B.S., Illinois State University, 1963, M.S., Illinois State University, 1965, Ph.D., University of Iowa, 1968He is nar wrangle in small group communication with particular emphasis in decision-making. His research has included theoretical, experimental, and critical studies of small group interaction. The focus of Gourans research interest is the ways in which communication functions in the service of task requirements in problem-solving and decisions-making groups.Randy Y. HirokawaHirokawa received his B.A from the University of Hawaii at Moana, and his M.A and Ph.D from the University of majuscule. He was inducted into the University Of Washington Department Of Hall of Fame.He is known for his expertise in area of small group communication and decision-making effectiveness. Hirokawas scholarship has contributed to the development of a theory called the Functional perspective.Outline Of My possibilitySituation Of How The Theory Came AboutThis theory came about as a four syllabuse sectional search committees institute to select final candidates for positions in rhetoric, theatre, journalism and broadcast producing. The whole department each group to come up with top-notch candidates and reliable with a discipline that values sensible and reasonable communication or discussion, it was likely supposed(a) that they would make their high quality decisions after systematic and reasoned discussion. wedded was the mix of communication interests, academic knowledge and professional prejudices that committee members bought to the table were not their final choices likely to be made on policy-making rather than rational grounds. But even if they were objective, it was a fear that their brawl debate over candidates would so cloud their judgement that they would end up making second-rate choices.Theorists Point Of Views Of The Situation And Their Contribution To Building The TheoryHirokawa and Gouran believe that these negative and gloomy views are not necessary. They assume that group members caring about the issue are reasonably intelligent, face a challenging task that calls for more facts and has new ideas, or a reform thinking. They are also persuaded that group communication has positive effect on the final decision.Hirokawa Randy speaks of the quality responses and developed the core principles of the theory during his calibrate studies, today his research tests refines this theory.Gouran Dennis refers to decisions that are appropriate and he has laid ground work for the theory with his early writing on the group decision making.Four Functions For Effective Decision MakingBy observing group decision making Hirokawa and Gouran see tha t there are task requirements and conditions that group members needs to accomplished to reach high-quality solutions and they refer to these conditions as requisite functions of effective decision making.Along with other pioneers research Hirokawa and Gouran drew an analogy between small groups and biological systems and saw thats just the aforesaid(prenominal) conditions that an organism must go through for excerption in an ever changing environment as group members must go through functions or have conditions during group decision makings for success in the choice they make. So then four functions were then created for effective decision making as followed. synopsis Of The ProblemIt is very important for group members to be realistic when looking at the current conditions of any situation that is cladding a problem and if there is any misunderstanding of the situation be likely to be complex when each member makes their final decision.The situation here is that the search comm ittee are facing difficulties in selecting candidates which is a problem. They could barely make up their mind. In such cases the group members needs to examine or investigate what the problem really is, then find ways to work out this problem. Analysing of the problem could also have steps to follow or some conditions that must be required. For example from the theory in one of the departments searches for a rhetorician, a theatre director etc presented no obvious difficulties, in this case a job description was drafted and advertised throughout the caller-up and through relationship management , searched for parties whom may be interested.Goal setDecision making needs to be clear and concise, therefore there must be some form of criteria for a proposed solution. Hirokawa and Gouran conjure that tribulation to comply with criteria will drive the decision to be governed by government rather than reason. An example portrayed by the two authors is the recruiting of faculty crite ria weredoctors degreeTeaching Experience (Minimum 5 Years)Scholar PublisherAnd to narrow the search, candidates must be able to engage / build rapport with students and who is able to absorb knowledge from a liberal arts point of view. In having criterias during decision making, this gives the group a short list of candidates and more confidence in their decision.Identifications Of AlternativesTo minimise risk in making a decision, Hirokawa and Gouran stressed the deduction of having alternative solutions, so that the group can always resort to plan B or plan C. In the case of finding a candidate for a Broadcast production role, the criteria was industry experience, hold a doctorate / masters, radio and broadcast experience. The search for the candidate was limited as not many had an advanced degree no-one had a background in video production. After many brainstorming sessions, this was given to a search committee to do more thorough research for the perfect candidate. As a resul t of continuous emails and networking the search committee generated relevant alternatives and observed two candidates whom they will chose one to fulfil the role.Evaluation Of Positive And negative CharacteristicsThe next step in decision making is weighing the alternatives. It is very important to look at the pro and cons of each option against the criteria given. The authors mention that decision making often muddles up, and in need of at least one member to remind each other of the positive and negative features of one option.Prioritizing These FunctionsIn order to make decisions one must place the four main functions for effective decision making. Hirokawa and Gouran mentioned that all four functions need to be accomplished to maximise the probability of a high quality decision. They also mention that as long as members use all four functions, what ever the order they like, they will come to a prosperous decision making. However, groups that resolve particularly difficult situation often lot a similar route to come to their final solution.The Role Of Communication In Fulfilling The FunctionsCommunication is the key factor for quality group decision making. Verbal discussion within a group makes it assertable to dispense information, identify errors and also to influence each other. Hirokawa believes that communication plays a racy role in shaping high quality decisions. They also believe that communication through discussion can also make the group wander in different directions and at the same time haul up them back onto the directed path. The authors outline third types of communication in decision making groups1) Promotive When the group moves along the same path and life history upon the four main decision functions.2) Disruptive Discussions that divert the group members away from the four main decision functions.3) Counteractive- The interaction that the group use to get each other back on track.The three types of communication supra are then aligned with the four functions to create the Function-Oriented Interaction cryptogram System (FOICS) Checklist. This register is used to analyse communication within a group by matching each column and each row like the diagram belowFrom The Tiny Pond To The Big oceanicThe preceding(prenominal) metaphor is Hirokawas way of portraying the review of his functional perspective in decision making , the risks that develop place within his research lab during his research and whether it was strong enough to withstand the multiple opposing forces from the real world and other researchers.Hirokawa concludes this metaphor by saying that there are times when following the prescriptions of decision making does not always lead to a decision that works. He then challenges researchers not to look at the outcome but look at what functional conditions work and what does not work.Practical Advice For Amateurs And ProfessionalsThe authors give us advice on how to use functional likely to come up with better decision making. They suggest the followingFor groups to use their own opinions.For groups to not have a close minded attitude.Groups to take proactive measures and reflective thinking.The authors acknowledge their intellectual their philosopher) John Dewey. Dewey advocated a six step process of reflective thinking (equivalent to Hirokawa and Gourans four requisite function) to the approach of treating a patient. His steps were as follows1) Recognise the illness2) Diagnose the cause of the illness3) Establish options for cure4) Consider possible remedies5) Test which solution will work6) Implement the best solutionDeweys process above is very similar to Hirokawa and Gourans four requisite functions in decision making. twain of these lists recommend that group members discuss ways that promotes problem analysis, goal setting, finding alternatives and the evaluation of these options.Applications Of The TheoryThis theory can be applied to everyday situations, whet her its at work, home, IT industry or anywhere of any situation where group members take part. Every time group member gather to make decision on some issues they will always be facing problem. Because each group member has different opinions of each situation or there would only be two or three members agreeing on the same situation. So therefore Hirokawa and Gouran have developed four functions to follow for effective group decision making. Not only that these two theorists has also written the roles to fulfilling these functions. This theory can be applied to the IT Industry because there is a situation that needs to be discussed as a group for whats good to be used in the IT industries.Evaluation Of The TheoryFrom the chapter three of Griffin (Weighing the Words) I have applied the appropriate evaluative standards to your theory which is Scientific Standard 2 Prediction of Future Events. This standard states a good objective theory predicts what will happen and it is only possib le when we are dealing with our five senses. Applying this to my theory is that each of these group members sees the situation and they hear what is being talked about in the group discussion to whether to agree or disagree is based on how they feel about the situation and think of the situation. This is to prevent problems that may happen in the future because it isnt prevented same problem will occur in the future.ConclusionSummary Of My Points Of InformationHirokawa and Gouran saw the situation and thought of ways to maintain it. They saw that just the same way that an organism must go through for survival in an ever changing environment is just the same way that group members must go through functions or have conditions during group decision makings for success in the choice they make. They then developed the four functions which are Analysis of the problem, goal setting, identification of alternatives and evaluation of Positive and prohibit characteristics. They also state the importance or prioritizing these functions and its roles to fulfilling these functions. They also stated a metaphor From tiny pond to the big ocean.A limited review Of My Theory (Weight Of Argument For And Against)This theory accounts for group decision-making performance in terms of the role that group communication plays in facilitating or impeding the groups efforts to perform cognitive and interpersonal decision-making functions. This theory has been identified as one of the three most influential theories of small group communication.The functional perspective that has been draw in this theory illustrates the wisdom of the joint interaction. As the Hebrew byword suggests, Without counsel plans go wrong, but with many advisers they succeed. Decision making can be regarded as an outcome of mental processes leading to the selection of a course of action among several alternatives. Every decision making process produces a final the output can be an action or an opinion of choi ceThe next step in decision making is weighing the alternatives. It is very important to look at the pro and cons of each option against the criteria given. The authors mention that decision making often muddles up, and in need of at least one member to remind each other of the positive and negative features of one option.Glossary Of Terms Perspective strength a way of regarding situations or topics or the appearance of things relative to one another as determined by their distance from the viewerFunctionalDesigned for or capable of a particular function or useEvaluationAct of ascertaining or fixing the value compulsoryNecessity anything indispensable or neededPromotiveInteraction that moves the group along the goal path by calling attention to one of the four requisiteDisruptiveInteraction that diverts, retards, or frustrates group members ability to achieve the four task functionsCounteractiveInteraction that members use to get the group back on trackAmateursAn amateur is generall y considered a person attached to a particular pursuit, study, or science, without formal breeding or payDecision MakingCan be regarded as an outcome of mental processes leading to the selection of a course of action among several alternatives.Group decisionIs decision making in groups consisting of multiple members/entities. The challenge of group decision is deciding what action a group should take. There are various systems designed to solve this problemReferences / BibliographyA Critical Summary of Research on the Role of Argument in Decision-MakingGroups. In Argument and Social Practice Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/AFA throng on Argumentation. J. Robert Cox, Malcolm O. Sillars, and Gregg B. Walker (Eds.). Annandale, Virginia Speech Communication Association, 1985. 14 pp. (Revised and reprinted in Readings in Argumentation. William L. Benoit, Dale Hample, and Pamela J. Benoit (Eds.). San Francisco Foris, 1992. 17 pp.)Benson, N., Malone, P. (1987), Teachers beliefs about share d decision making and work alientation. EBSCO host Education, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p244, 8p, 6 chartsGriffin, E. (2009). A first look at communication theory. (7th ed.). New York McGraw HillRandy, H., Dennis, G. (2009). Functional perspective on group decision making. (7th ed.). Group and Public communication Group decision making. Chp. 17Randy, H. (1998). Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective. Human Communication Research, Vol. 14, p487 515, No. 4The Role of Communication in Decision-Making Groups A Functional Perspective. In Communications in Transition. Mary S. Mander (Ed.). New York Praeger, 1983. 21 pp. With Randy Y. Hirokawa. (First Author)Toseland, RonaldW., Rivas, Robert F., Chapman D. (1984). An evaluation of decision making methods task groups. EBSCO host Social work, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p339-346, 8pInternet SourcesBenson, N., Malone, P., Teachers beliefs about shared decision making and work alientation. Retrieved on July 28, 2009 , from http//web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1hid=108sid=c11c7b30-a902-46f1-96a5-9d484e1b62b8%40sessionmgr110bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3ddb=f5hAN=5271089Toseland, RonaldW., Rivas, Robert F., Chapman D. ,An evaluation of decision making methods task groups. Retrieved on August 1, 2009, From http//web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1hid=12sid=cc76eb43-f251-4f74-870f-20d856b51553%40sessionmgr4bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3ddb=f5hAN=4708464Randy, H., Dennis, G. (2009). Functional perspective on group decision making. Group and Public communication, Retrieved on July 19, 2009, from http//www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119457900/abstract?CRETRY=1SRETRY=0Randy, H. (1998). Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective, Retrieved on July 10, 2009, from http//www.afirstlook.com/main.cfm/theory_resources/Functional_Perspective_on_Group_Decision_Making